MUHAMMAD v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
RAHEEM MUHAMMAD |
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, MEGAN J. BRENNAN, PATRICK R. DONAHUE, GERALD ROANE, JANE DOE BELLO, JANE DOE and DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA |
1:2016cv01079 |
June 8, 2016 |
US District Court for the District of Columbia |
Washington, DC Office |
11001 |
Emmet G. Sullivan |
Other Statutory Actions |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2671 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 52 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER denying Plaintiff's 41 Fourth Renewed Motion for Accommodations, to Appoint Counsel, and to Transfer Case; denying Plaintiff's 47 Fifth Renewed Motion for Accommodations, to Appoint Counsel, and to Transfer Ca se; denying Plaintiff's 49 Motion to Strike; denying Plaintiff's requests in his 50 Response to the Court; and deferring ruling on Defendants' 45 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Prosecution. Joint report due by March 15, 2019. See Order for details. Signed by Judge Timothy J. Kelly on 2/15/2019. (lctjk2) |
Filing 29 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting Defendant District of Columbia's 9 Motion to Dismiss; granting in part and denying in part Defendants United States, Megan J. Brennan, Patrick R. Donahoe, Gerald Roane, Jane Doe Bello, and Jane Doe's 16 Motion to Dismiss; denying Plaintiff's 24 Motion to Vacate Minute Orders and Transfer Case; and denying Plaintiff's 28 Renewed Motion to Vacate Minute Orders and Transfer Case. See Opinion and Order for details. Signed by Judge Timothy J. Kelly on 3/7/2018. (lctjk2) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.