Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 98
Raheem Muhammad v. USA, et al
as 19-5109
Defendant / Appellee: District of Columbia, Jane Doe Bello, Patrick R. Donahue, Former Postmaster General and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: Raheem Muhammad
MUHAMMAD v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv01079
Plaintiff: RAHEEM MUHAMMAD
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, MEGAN J. BRENNAN, PATRICK R. DONAHUE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-1876
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2016cv04023
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2015cv04932
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-1943
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Julian Hood, Jr. v. Patrick Donahoe
as 15-1944
Plaintiff - Appellant: JULIAN R. HOOD, JR.
Defendant - Appellee: PATRICK R. DONAHOE, named as Patrick R. Donahue, Postmaster General
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 15-13441
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv02679
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2015cv00411
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?