SANDERS v. U.S. EPA ADMINISTRATOR et al
| SANDERS and LAUNEIL SANDERS |
| U.S. EPA ADMINISTRATOR, SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL, ABITIBI BOWATER and INTERNATIONAL PAPER COMPANY |
| 1:2017cv00431 |
| March 10, 2017 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Washington, DC Office |
| 88888 |
| Unassigned |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 10, 2017. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER DISMISSING PRO SE CASE WITH PREJUDICE AS FRIVOLOUS. Ordered that the application of the plaintiff to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. ORDERED that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915 (a)(3) the Court certifies that an appeal of this final order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly on 3/7/17. (sth)
|
| Filing 3 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly on 3/7/17. (sth) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by LAUNEIL SANDERS (sth) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against ABITIBI BOWATER, INTERNATIONAL PAPER COMPANY, SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL, U.S. EPA ADMINISTRATOR filed by LAUNEIL SANDERS. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(sth) |
| Initiating Pleading & IFP Application Received on 1/31/17. (sth) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
