Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 44
United States of America et al v. D.R. Horton, Inc et al
as 2:2024cv00428
Plaintiff: United States of America, State of Alabama and South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control
Defendant: D.R. Horton, Inc and D.R. Horton, Inc.-Birmingham
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1319 Clean Water Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2024cv00200
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Tolbert et al v. South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2023cv06600
Plaintiff: MD Alicia L Tolbert and Bret Tolbert
Defendant: South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control, Edward Simmer and Jessica A Shields
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Admiral Insurance Company v. McNair et al
as 2:2023cv05530
Plaintiff: Admiral Insurance Company
Defendant: Paula McNair, Drucilla Atherton, Sean Avant and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Type: Contract Insurance
South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control v. The United States of America et al
as 0:2022cv03445
Defendant: Alpha Assembly Solutions, Inc., Ashland Inc., INEOS US Chemicals Company and others
Plaintiff: South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9601 Hazardous Substances Releases, Liability - Definition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv01938
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00526
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Planned Parenthood South Atlantic v. Alan Wilson We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 21-1369
Defendant: EDWARD SIMMER, in his official capacity as Director of the South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control, SCARLETT A. WILSON, in her official capacity as Solicitor for South Carolina's 9th Judicial Circuit, CHRISTOPHER C. WRIGHT, in his official capacity as a Member of the South Carolina Board of Medical Examiners and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: GREENVILLE WOMEN'S CLINIC, on behalf of itself, its patients, and its physicians and staff, PLANNED PARENTHOOD SOUTH ATLANTIC, on behalf of itself, its patients, and its physicians and staff and TERRY L. BUFFKIN, M.D., on behalf of himself and his patients
Intervenor: HENRY MCMASTER, in his official capacity as Governor of the State of South Carolina and JAMES H. LUCAS, a/k/a Jay, in his official capacity as Speaker of the South Carolina House of Representatives
Defendant / Appellant: WILLIAM WALTER WILKINS, III, in his official capacity as Solicitor for South Carolina's 13th Judicial Circuit and ALAN WILSON, in his official capacity as Attorney General of South Carolina
Woodcreek Development, LLC et al v. Village at Sandhill, LLC et al
as 3:2021cv00951
Plaintiff: Premium Development, LLC, Walden Place Property Owners Association, Inc., Woodcreek Development, LLC and others
Defendant: Village at Sandhill, LLC, Richland County, South Carolina Department of Transportation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
South Carolina, State of v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
as 21-1085
Defendant / Appellant: MAJOR GENERAL DIANA M. HOLLAND, in her official capacity as Commanding General, South Atlantic Division, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS SAVANNAH DISTRICT, RYAN D. MCCARTHY, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Army and others
Intervenor Plaintiff: SAVANNAH RIVERKEEPER
Plaintiff / Appellee: STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, AUGUSTA, GEORGIA, SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?