REPORTERS COMMITTEE FOR FREEDOM OF THE PRESS v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION et al
| REPORTERS COMMITTEE FOR FREEDOM OF THE PRESS |
| FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE |
| 1:2017cv01701 |
| August 21, 2017 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Washington, DC Office |
| 11001 |
| Rudolph Contreras |
| Freedom of Information Act |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 552 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
73
MEMORANDUM OPINION granting in part and denying in part 64 Defendants' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, and granting in part and denying in part 65 Plaintiff's Cross-Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. See document for details. Signed by Judge Rudolph Contreras on 10-21-2022. (lcrc3)
|
|
Filing
59
MEMORANDUM OPINION granting in part and denying in part 47 Defendants' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; denying 49 Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; and denying 50 Plaintiff's Motion for In Camera Review. See document for details. Signed by Judge Rudolph Contreras on 7/12/2021. (lcrc1)
|
|
Filing
29
MEMORANDUM OPINION denying 19 Defendants' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; granting 21 Plaintiff's Cross-Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. See document for details. Signed by Judge Rudolph Contreras on 3/1/19. (lcrc1)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
