JONES et al v. STATE OF GEORGIA
CELESTE JONES and AUTUMN JONES |
STATE OF GEORGIA |
1:2018cv01888 |
August 13, 2018 |
US District Court for the District of Columbia |
Washington, DC Office |
11001 |
Unassigned |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 10, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Receipt on 10/10/2018 of Electronic Transfer. Other Court Number 1:18-cv-04700 sent by Northern District of Georgia. (zrdj) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Extraction of case transferred to USDC for the Northern District of Georgia (zsb) |
Case transferred to the USDC for the Northern District of Georgia, pursuant to Court Order entered 09/17/2018. Sent to Court Electronically. (zsb) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Change of Address by AUTUMN JONES, CELESTE JONES (zsb) |
Filing 3 ORDER TRANSFERRING PRO SE CASE to the USDC for the Northern District of Georgia. Pro Se party has been notified by first class mail. Transfer due by 10/7/2018. Signed by Judge Christopher R. Cooper on 9/13/2018. (zrdj) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by AUTUMN JONES (zsb) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against STATE OF GEORGIA filed by AUTUMN JONES.(zsb) |
Initiating Pleading & IFP Application Received on 08/13/2018. A copy of the docket sheet has been mailed to the address of record for the pro se party. (zsb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.