HALL v. STONEMAN et al
| ROYAL DANIEL HALL |
| DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and CHRISTINE STONEMAN |
| 1:2019cv00109 |
| January 11, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Prisoner Petition: Civil Rights (Other) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 25, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 PARTIAL PRISONER TRUST FUND ACCOUNT STATEMENT by ROYAL DANIEL HALL (zsb) |
| Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by ROYAL DANIEL HALL (zsb) |
Filing 4
PRO SE ORDER directing within 30 days of this Order, unless an extension of time is granted, plaintiff to provide a six month trust fund prisoner account statement and failure to comply will result in dismissal of case. Plaintiff shall provide the requested information specific within this order. Pro Se party has been notified by first class mail. Signed by Judge Timothy J. Kelly on 1/28/2019. (zrdj)
|
| Filing 3 PRISONER TRUST FUND ACCOUNT STATEMENT for period of six months by ROYAL DANIEL HALL (zsb) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by ROYAL DANIEL HALL (zsb) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, CHRISTINE STONEMAN filed by ROYAL DANIEL HALL. (Attachment: #1 Supplement)(zsb) |
| Initiating Pleading & IFP Application Received on 01/11/2019. A copy of the docket sheet has been mailed to the address of record for the pro se party. (zsb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
