OLUMIDE v. UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL et al
| ADE OLUMIDE |
| SENATE REPUBLICAN CONFERENCE, HOUSE DEMOCRATIC CAUCUS, HOUSE REPUBLICAN CONFERENCE, SENATE DEMOCRATIC CAUCUS and UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL |
| 1:2020cv00247 |
| January 27, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Voting |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 19, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 AMENDED MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by ADE OLUMIDE (Attachment: #1 Supplement)(zsb) |
Filing 3
ORDERED that within thirty (30) days of this Order, plaintiff shall either submit an aceptable amended IFP application for review or pay the $400 filing fee applicable to civil actions. Failure to comply will result in dismissal of this case without prejudice. Signed by Judge Trevor N. McFadden on 03/05/2020. (zmc)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by ADE OLUMIDE. (zmd) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against HOUSE DEMOCRATIC CAUCUS, HOUSE REPUBLICAN CONFERENCE, SENATE DEMOCRATIC CAUCUS, SENATE REPUBLICAN CONFERENCE, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL filed by ADE OLUMIDE. (zmd) |
| Initiating Pleading & IFP Application Received on 1/27/2020. A copy of the docket sheet has been mailed to the address of record for the pro se party. (zmd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
