HERNDON v. STATE OF TEXAS et al
JACOB REA'SHAW HERNDON |
STATE OF TEXAS, VANESSA GILMORE, HARRIS COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE and HARRIS COUNTY PUBLIC DEFENDERS OFFICE |
1:2021cv01119 |
April 23, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of Columbia |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 26, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 ORDER DISMISSING PRO SE CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Ordered that the application of the plaintiff to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. This is a final appealable Order. Pro Se party has been notified by first class mail. Signed by Judge Trevor N. McFadden on 05/26/2021. (zsb) |
Filing 4 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Trevor N. McFadden on 05/26/2021. (zsb) |
Filing 3 MOTION for Service by Publication by JACOB REA'SHAW HERNDON. (Attachment: #1 Points and Authorities)(zsb) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by JACOB REA'SHAW HERNDON. (zsb) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, VANESSA GILMORE, HARRIS COUNTY PUBLIC DEFENDERS OFFICE, HARRIS COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, STATE OF TEXAS with Jury Demand filed by JACOB REA'SHAW HERNDON.(zsb) |
Initiating Pleading & IFP Application Received on 04/23/2021. A copy of the docket sheet has been mailed to the address of record for the pro se party. (zsb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.