MOROZOVA et al v. IMMIGRANT INVESTOR PROGRAM OFFICE
TATIANA A. MOROZOVA, D.M. and M.M. |
IMMIGRANT INVESTOR PROGRAM OFFICE |
1:2022cv01938 |
July 5, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of Columbia |
Royce C Lamberth |
Immigration: Other Immigration Actions |
05 U.S.C. ยง 551 Administrative Procedure Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 2, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
MINUTE ORDER: #4 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer is GRANTED. It is ORDERED that the defendant shall respond to the complaint no later than 10/6/2022. SO ORDERED by Judge Royce C. Lamberth on 09/02/2022. (lcrcl2) |
Filing 4 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, by IMMIGRANT INVESTOR PROGRAM OFFICE. (Johnson, Stephanie) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Stephanie R. Johnson on behalf of IMMIGRANT INVESTOR PROGRAM OFFICE (Johnson, Stephanie) |
Filing 2 SUMMONS (3) Issued Electronically as to IMMIGRANT INVESTOR PROGRAM OFFICE, U.S. Attorney, and U.S. Attorney General (Attachment: #1 Notice and Consent)(zsb) (Main Document 2 replaced on 7/7/2022) (zsb). Modified on 7/7/2022 to correct summonses (zsb). |
Case Assigned to Judge Royce C. Lamberth. (zsb) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against IMMIGRANT INVESTOR PROGRAM OFFICE ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ADCDC-9349032) filed by TATIANA A. MOROZOVA, M.M., D.M.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons IPO, #3 Summons USAG, #4 Summons USAO)(Bless, Jesse) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.