CHINESE AMERICAN LEGAL DEFENSE ALLIANCE v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
Plaintiff: CHINESE AMERICAN LEGAL DEFENSE ALLIANCE
Defendant: DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Case Number: 1:2022cv02001
Filed: July 11, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of Columbia
Presiding Judge: Tanya S Chutkan
Nature of Suit: Freedom of Information Act
Cause of Action: 05 U.S.C. ยง 552 Freedom of Information Act
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 19, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 19, 2022 Set/Reset Deadlines: Answer due by 9/16/2022. (tb)
August 15, 2022 Opinion or Order MINUTE ORDER: Granting Consent #4 Motion for Extension of Deadlines. Defendants shall answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint by September 16, 2022. Signed by Judge Tanya S. Chutkan on 8/15/22. (DJS)
August 12, 2022 Filing 4 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, by FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE. (Johnson, Stephanie)
July 31, 2022 Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Stephanie R. Johnson on behalf of FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE (Johnson, Stephanie)
July 14, 2022 Filing 2 SUMMONS (4) Issued Electronically as to FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Attachment: #1 Notice and Consent)(zsss)
July 12, 2022 Case Assigned to Judge Tanya S. Chutkan. (zsb)
July 11, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ADCDC-9361510) filed by CHINESE AMERICAN LEGAL DEFENSE ALLIANCE. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1- Request, #2 Exhibit 2- Response, #3 Exhibit 3- May 3, 2022 ECD, #4 Exhibit 4- DOJ ECD Response, #5 Exhibit 5- June 21, 2022 ECD, #6 Civil Cover Sheet, #7 Summons to DOJ, #8 Summons to FBI, #9 Summons to USAG, #10 Summons to USAO)(Sorenson, C.)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: CHINESE AMERICAN LEGAL DEFENSE ALLIANCE v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: CHINESE AMERICAN LEGAL DEFENSE ALLIANCE
Represented By: C. Peter Sorenson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
Represented By: Stephanie R. Johnson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Represented By: Stephanie R. Johnson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?