KITLINSKI v. UNITED STATES COAST GUARD
| DAREK J. KITLINSKI |
| UNITED STATES COAST GUARD |
| 1:2022cv02391 |
| August 12, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Tanya S Chutkan |
| Freedom of Information Act |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 552 Freedom of Information Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 19, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Set/Reset Deadlines: Answer due by 10/19/2022. (tb) |
MINUTE ORDER: Defendant's #10 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is GRANTED. Defendant's Answer is now due 10/19/2022. Signed by Judge Tanya S. Chutkan on 09/14/2022. (lcwk)
|
| Filing 10 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response to Complaint by UNITED STATES COAST GUARD. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Dreier, Douglas) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Douglas C. Dreier on behalf of UNITED STATES COAST GUARD (Dreier, Douglas) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER: Advising pro se Plaintiff of his obligation to follow the FRCP, Local Rules, and orders of the court. Failure to adhere to these rules or orders may result in sanctions, up to and including dismissal of this action. The Clerk of the Court shall mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff at his address of record. Signed by Judge Tanya S. Chutkan on 08/23/2022. (lcwk)
|
|
MINUTE ORDER: Granting #4 Motion for CM/ECF Password. The Clerk of the Court shall mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff at his address of record. Signed by Judge Tanya S. Chutkan on 08/23/2022. (lcwk)
|
| Filing 7 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed as to the United States Attorney. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney on 8/18/2022. Answer due for ALL FEDERAL DEFENDANTS by 9/17/2022. (znmw) |
| Filing 6 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed on United States Attorney General. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney General 8/18/2022. (znmw) |
| Filing 5 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. UNITED STATES COAST GUARD served on 8/19/2022 (znmw) |
| Filing 4 MOTION for CM/ECF Password by DAREK J. KITLINSKI. (znmw) |
| Filing 3 NEW Pro Se Consent To Receive Notices of Electronic Filing by DAREK J. KITLINSKI (znmw) |
| Filing 2 ERRATA by DAREK J. KITLINSKI re #1 Complaint. (znmw) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against UNITED STATES COAST GUARD (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 202782) filed by DAREK J. KITLINSKI. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(znmw) |
| SUMMONS (3) Issued as to UNITED STATES COAST GUARD, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (znmw) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: KITLINSKI v. UNITED STATES COAST GUARD | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: DAREK J. KITLINSKI | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: UNITED STATES COAST GUARD | |
| Represented By: | Douglas C. Dreier |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
