WILSON v. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
| GAR WAYNE WILSON and GARRY WAYNE WILSON |
| DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR and US DEPT OF JUSTICE |
| 1:2022cv02467 |
| August 17, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Prisoner Petition: Mandamus & Other (Other) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 MOTION to Alter OR Amend Judgment as to #4 Memorandum & Opinion, #5 Order Dismissing Pro Se Case, by GARRY WAYNE WILSON. (zmrl) |
Filing 5
ORDER DISMISSING PRO SE CASE. Ordered that the application of the plaintiff to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. This is a final appealable Order. Pro Se party has been notified by first class mail. Signed by Judge Florence Y. Pan on 08/31/2022. (zsb)
|
| Filing 4 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Florence Y. Pan on 08/31/2022. (zsb) |
| Filing 3 PRISONER TRUST FUND ACCOUNT STATEMENT for period of six months by GAR WAYNE WILSON (rj) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by GAR WAYNE WILSON. (rj) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Mandamus filed by GAR WAYNE WILSON.(rj) |
| Initiating Pleading & IFP Application Received on 8/17/2022. A copy of the docket sheet has been mailed to the address of record for the pro se party. (rj) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
