RAZA et al v. BLINKEN et al
| MOHAMMED WASIM RAZA, KHUSHI ASHRAFI, I.R. and M.A. |
| ANTONY J. BLINKEN, RENA BITTER, PATRICIA LACINA, JOEL REIFMAN, JOHN DOE, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, CHRISTOPHER WRAY and MERRICK GARLAND |
| 1:2022cv03308 |
| October 28, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| James E Boasberg |
| Immigration: Other Immigration Actions |
| 08 U.S.C. ยง 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against RENA BITTER, ANTONY J. BLINKEN, JOHN DOE, MERRICK GARLAND, PATRICIA LACINA, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, JOEL REIFMAN, CHRISTOPHER WRAY ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ADCDC-9633958) filed by I.R., KHUSHI ASHRAFI, M.A., MOHAMMED WASIM RAZA. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Index and Exhibits A to G, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Summons for Secretary of State Antony J. Blinken, #4 Summons for Assistant Secretary of State Rena Bitter, #5 Summons for Charge D'Affaires Patricia Lacina, #6 Summons for Consul General Jennifer Larson, #7 Summons for NIV Officer John Doe, #8 Summons for DHS Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas, #9 Summons for FBI Director Christopher Wray, #10 Summons for U.S. Attorney General Merrick Garland, #11 Summons for Civil Process Clerk, US Attorney's Office)(Rosen, Adam) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
