JOHNSON v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
| DANA JOHNSON |
| WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY |
| 1:2023cv00938 |
| April 5, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Beryl A Howell |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 791 Job Discrimination (Rehabilitation Act) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 26, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Su Mi Park on behalf of DANA JOHNSON (Park, Su Mi) |
Filing 4
STANDING ORDER. Signed by Judge Beryl A. Howell on April 13, 2023. (lcbah3)
|
| Filing 3 SUMMONS (1) Issued Electronically as to WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY. (Attachment: #1 Notice and Consent)(zsl) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET by DANA JOHNSON re #1 Complaint filed by DANA JOHNSON. Related document: #1 Complaint filed by DANA JOHNSON.(Clark, Denise) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Beryl A. Howell. (zsl) |
|
MINUTE ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE: Plaintiff filed this action on April 6, 2023. On April 7, 2023, the Clerk of the Court issued a notice that Plaintiff's filings included two errors, and directed Plaintiff to correct the errors with compliant re-filings by the close of business that day. To date, Plaintiff has failed to do so. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that by April 18, 2023, Plaintiff shall SHOW CAUSE for the failure to comply with the April 7, 2023 Notice of Error. Should Plaintiff fail to do so, the court may dismiss this action without further notice. See LCvR 83.23. Signed by Judge Tanya S. Chutkan on 04/11/2023. (lcss)
|
| NOTICE OF ERROR re #1 Complaint; emailed to dmclark@benefitcounsel.com, cc'd 2 associated attorneys -- The PDF file you docketed contained errors: 1. Blank or missing coversheet. Please use the cover sheet at https://www.dcd.uscourts.gov/new-case-forms & file using the event Civil Cover Sheet., 2. Form filed as fillable PDF. Please file form in a non-fillable PDF format., 3. COMPLIANCE DEADLINE is by close of business today. This case will not proceed any further until all errors are satisfied. (zsl, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY with Jury Demand ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ADCDC-9979229) filed by DANA JOHNSON. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(Clark, Denise) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: JOHNSON v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: DANA JOHNSON | |
| Represented By: | Denise Marie Clark |
| Represented By: | Su Mi Park |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
