YOUNG v. GARLAND et al
| TIMOTHY DOYLE YOUNG |
| MERRICK GARLAND, MICHAEL HOROWITZ, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| 1:2023cv02138 |
| July 21, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Prisoner Petition: Civil Rights (Other) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 5, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF APPEAL TO DC CIRCUIT COURT as to #3 Order Dismissing Pro Se Case, by TIMOTHY DOYLE YOUNG. Fee Status: No Fee Paid. Parties have been notified. (zsl) |
Filing 3
ORDER DISMISSING PRO SE CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Ordered that the application of the plaintiff to proceed in forma pauperis is denied. This is a final appealable Order. Pro Se party has been notified by first class mail. Signed by Judge Carl J. Nichols on 08/30/2023. (Attachment: #1 07-cv-01317-UNA, 08-5191 USCA Order) (zsl)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by TIMOTHY DOYLE YOUNG. (zsl) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants with Jury Demand filed by TIMOTHY DOYLE YOUNG. (Attachment: #1 Exhibit)(zsl) |
| Initiating Pleading & IFP Application Received on 07/21/2023. A copy of the docket sheet has been mailed to the address of record for the pro se party. (zsl) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
