PHAN v. MAYORKAS et al
| ANH THUY PHAN |
| UR M. JADDOU and SUSAN DIBBINS |
| ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS |
| 1:2024cv00347 |
| February 6, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Trevor N McFadden |
| Immigration: Other Immigration Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 8, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 SUMMONS (5) Issued Electronically as to All Defendants, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Attachments: #1 Notice and Consent)(zljn) |
Filing 2
STANDING ORDER Establishing Procedures for Cases Before Judge Trevor N. McFadden. The parties are hereby ORDERED to read and comply with the directives in the attached standing order. SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Trevor N. McFadden on 2/7/2024. (lctnm3)
|
| Case Assigned to Judge Trevor N. McFadden. (zsl) |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS against SUSAN DIBBINS, UR M. JADDOU, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ADCDC-10670319) filed by ANH THUY PHAN. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit to Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Case Cover Sheet, #3 Summons as to Alejandro Majorkas, #4 Summons as to Ur M. Jaddou, #5 Summons as to Susan Dibbins, #6 Summons as to U.S Attorney's Office of DC, #7 Summons as to the Attorney General of the United States)(Meyer, Brandon) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
