Matthews v. Day et al
| Joshua Matthews |
| FNU Underwood, FNU Stone, FNU Bracket, Juliane Day, FNU Jacobsen, FNU Thomas, FNU Hayes, FNU Fornash and FNU Haake |
| 5:2018cv00396 |
| July 30, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Ocala Office |
| Sumter |
| Wm Terrell Hodges |
| Philip R Lammens |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 21, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 JUDGMENT entered. Civil Appeals checklist attached. (Signed by Deputy Clerk) (RLK) |
Filing 4
ORDER dismissing case. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment dismissing this case without prejudice, terminate any pending motions, and close the file. Signed by Senior Judge Wm. Terrell Hodges on 9/20/2018. (CRR)
|
|
Filing 3
STANDING ORDER for all confined, pro se litigants. Signed by Magistrate Judge Philip R. Lammens on 8/2/2018. (Attachments: #1 Attachment) (Copy mailed to Plaintiff) (MLS)
|
| Filing 2 NOTICE of designation under Local Rule 3.05 - track 1. Signed by Deputy Clerk on 8/2/2018. (Copy mailed to Plaintiff) (MLS) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against FNU Bracket, Juliane Day, FNU Fornash, FNU Haake, FNU Hayes, FNU Jacobsen, FNU Stone, FNU Thomas and FNU Underwood with Jury Demand filed by Joshua Matthews. (No fees paid, No service copies provided)(LMF) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
