Cases 1 - 10 of 48
Cleckler v. McClain et al
as 2:2024cv00440
Petitioner:
Joshua Matthew Cleckler
Respondent:
Antonio McClain and Steve Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Joshua Stockton v. Joe Page, et al
as 23-3770
Plaintiff:
Joshua Matthew Stockton
Defendant:
Joe Page, Superintendant, Pine Bluf Unit, ADC, Arkansas Department of Correction, Mary Cobbs, Major, Pine Bluff Coplex and others
Joshua Stockton v. Cannon, et al
as 23-3441
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Joshua Matthew Stockton
Defendant / Appellee:
Cannon, Sgt., Night Shift, Pine Bluff Complex, ADC, Howell, Cpl. , Maintenance Supervisor, Pine Bluff Complex, ADC, Barron, Sgt., Pine Bluff Complex, ADC and others
RICHARDS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv13071
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA MATTHEW RICHARDS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Stockton v. Cannon et al
as 4:2023cv00682
Plaintiff:
Joshua Matthew Stockton
Defendant:
Cannon, Howell and Barron
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Joshua Haney v. CIR
as 23-70095
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOSHUA MATTHEW HANEY
Respondent / Appellee:
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
USA v. Garvin
as 23-10584
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Joshua Matthew Garvin
JONES v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv21060
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA MATTHEW JONES
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
US v. Joshua Houchins
as 21-4651
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JOSHUA MATTHEW HOUCHINS
John Creel v. Mark Loy, et al
as 21-35280
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN MATTHEW CREEL, as the Personal Representative of the Estate of Joshua Matthew Creel, on behalf of the heirs of Joshua Matthew Creel
Defendant / Appellee:
MARK G. LOY, DOES, 1-10 and ACTIVE TRUCK TRANSPORT, LLC, d/b/a ACTIVE USA, LLC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
