Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Campbell v. Lochrie et al
as 5:2023cv00709
Plaintiff:
Trimard C. Campbell
Defendant:
FNU Lochrie, Deputy FNU Reid, FNU Duffy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Spahr v. Davis et al
as 5:2022cv00484
Plaintiff:
Steven Charles Spahr
Defendant:
FNU Davis, FNU Lancaster, FNU Wood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Haines
as 22-50519
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Phillip G. Scott
Defendant / Appellee:
Sergeant FNU Haines, Comal County Jail, Cert. Officer FNU Andrade, #3375, Comal County Jail, Officer FNU Hayes, #3400, Comal County Jail and others
Cobb v. Haddon, et al
as 22-4048
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRENT MAYON COBB
Defendant / Appellee:
LARRY BENZON, Warden, Utah State Prison, MIKE HADDON, Executive Director, Utah State Prison, KENT DEMILL, Board of Pardons Chair Person and others
Scott v. Haines et al
as 5:2022cv00327
Plaintiff:
Phillip G. Scott
Defendant:
Sgt. FNU Haines, Cert. Ofc. FNU Andrade and Ofc. FNU Hayes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cobb v. Haddon, et al
as 22-4016
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRENT MAYON COBB
Defendant / Appellee:
MIKE HADDON, Executive Director, Utah State Prison, LARRY BENZON, Warden Utah State Prison, KENT DEMILL, Board of Pardons chair person and others
Rigsby v. Quater et al
as 5:2021cv00574
Defendant:
FNU Quater, Oklahoma Department of Corrections and FNU Hayes
Plaintiff:
Dennis Ray Rigsby, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stuart v. Hyle et al
as 1:2021cv00202
Defendant:
FNU Parks, FNU Brinkly, FNU Cooper and others
Plaintiff:
Hezron Benjamin Stuart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Wallace et al
as 1:2021cv00057
Plaintiff:
Jason Ray Smith
Defendant:
TDCJ, FNU Hayes, FNU LNU and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kirven v. Gallegos et al
as 2:2020cv00401
Plaintiff:
Loydale Kirven
Defendant:
FNU Gallegos, FNU Hayes, FNU Wornell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
