RODRIGUEZ v. SERRANO et al
| DARIO MICHEAL RODRIGUEZ |
| KATHY SERRANO, J ADAMS, ANDERSON, BALL, CHRISTOPHER BAISDEN, ELWYN BELL, BILL BRADLEY, BARBARA BUCKLEY, PAMELA BUNDY, BUTCHER, CICCONE, DORTCH, ESTRADA, FLANNAGAN, FLEMING, FLORIDA JUSTICE INSTITUTE, FLORIDA STATE BAR, MJ HALE, AW HERRING, ANNETTE HILL, MIKE HUCKABEE, HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH, KEITH, DEBRA KEMP, LAMDA LEGAL SERVICE, AWOL LANE, JESSIE LIE, MCMANUS, SAM MILLIKEN, MITCHELL, ASHLEY MOODY, HARRY REID, SCARPATI, SWAIN, ANGIE SOLIS, VALPELLETTI and WALTON |
| 5:2022cv00098 |
| May 25, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
| MICHAEL J FRANK |
| T KENT WETHERELL |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 3, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
ORDER. The clerk of the court shall return Plaintiffs letter without filing it on the electronic docket. The clerk of court shall refer, on a deficiency order, any future document submitted for filing that fails to comply with court rules of procedure. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL J FRANK on 7/22/2022. (mb)
|
| Filing 13 DOCKET ANNOTATION BY COURT: Re #12 Notice to Clerk. Copy of #11 Order resent to Plaintiff w/Amended COMPLAINT form. (mb) |
|
Filing 11
ORDER - Plaintiff's request for reconsideration is DENIED and his objection to this court's order is OVERRULED. The clerk of the court is directed to send to Plaintiff a complaint form for use by prisoners in section 1983 actions. This case number should be on the form. On or before 8/3/2022, Plaintiff shall file: a. a notice of voluntary dismissal pursuant to Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; or b. an amended complaint that is typed or clearly written, submitted on the court-approved form, and which is no longer than 25 pages. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL J FRANK on 7/13/2022. (jcw)(Form sent as ordered.)
|
| Filing 12 NOTICE to Clerk, by DARIO MICHEAL RODRIGUEZ. (mb) |
| ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL J FRANK notified that action is needed Re: #10 OBJECTION, #9 MOTION FOR PERMINATE [sic] EMERGENCY RELIEF, #7 Order - Amended complaint was not filed. Referred to MICHAEL J FRANK. (jcw) |
| Filing 10 RESPONSE, OBJECTION TO COURT ORDER re #7 Order by DARIO MICHEAL RODRIGUEZ. (jcw) Modified on 7/13/2022 (jcw). |
| Filing 9 MOTION FOR PERMINATE [sic] EMERGENCY RELIEF by DARIO MICHEAL RODRIGUEZ. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit, #2 Declaration, #3 Letter) (jcw) Modified on 7/13/2022 (jcw). |
| Filing 8 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by DARIO MICHEAL RODRIGUEZ. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit in Support) (jcw) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER denying without prejudice #2 Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages. The clerk of the court shall strike Plaintiff's complaint, Doc. #1 , from the record. Plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis, Doc. #1 -2, is DENIED without prejudice. The clerk of the court is directed to send to Plaintiff a complaint form for use by prisoners in section 1983 actions and a motion to proceed in forma pauperis for use by prisoners and a Prisoner Consent Form and Financial Certificate approved for use in the Northern District of Florida. This case number should be written on the forms. On or before June 27, 2022, Plaintiff shall:a. pay the $402 fee ($350 filing fee and $52 administrative fee) to the clerk of the court; or b. submit a fully-completed motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis with the requisite Prisoner Consent Form and Financial Certificate signed by a prison official, and an attached printout of the transactions in Plaintiffs inmate trust account during the six-month period of incarceration preceding the filing of this suit. On or before June 27, 2022, Plaintiff shall: a. file a notice of voluntary dismissal pursuant to Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; or b. file an amended complaint that is typed or clearly written, submitted on the court-approved form, and is no longer than 25 pages. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL J FRANK on 5/27/2022. (jcw)(Forms sent as ordered.)
|
| ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL J FRANK notified that action is needed Re: #8 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Referred to MICHAEL J FRANK. (jcw) |
| Set Deadlines re #7 Order - Amended Pleadings due by 6/27/2022. Fee due by 6/27/2022. (jcw) |
| Filing 6 Notice to Pro Se (jcw) |
| ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL J FRANK notified that action is needed Re: #1 Complaint, #2 MOTION FOR LEAVE OF COURT PERMISSION TO FILE THE LONGER THAN NORMAL (1983 COMPLAINT), #5 Affidavit in Support, #4 MOTION to Appoint Counsel, #3 MOTION to Seal. Referred to MICHAEL J FRANK. (jcw) |
| Filing 5 DECLARATION OF LAW by DARIO MICHEAL RODRIGUEZ. (jcw) |
| Filing 4 MOTION to the Appointment of Counsel Request for Evidentiary Hearing by DARIO MICHEAL RODRIGUEZ. (jcw) |
| Filing 3 MOTION FOR COURT ORDER DOCUMENTS UNDER COURT SEAL by DARIO MICHEAL RODRIGUEZ. (jcw) |
| Filing 2 MOTION FOR LEAVE OF COURT PERMISSION TO FILE THE LONGER THAN NORMAL (1983 COMPLAINT) by DARIO MICHEAL RODRIGUEZ. (jcw) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by DARIO MICHEAL RODRIGUEZ. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits A-O, #2 IFP Documents)(Filing fee was not paid. No service copies filed.) (jcw) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
