Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Anderson v. Beeman et al
as 1:2026cv02190
Plaintiff:
Terence M. Anderson
Defendant:
William James Beeman and Holly L. Hoover, CRNP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv00938
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Darryl Louis, Jr. v. Joel Anderson
as 26-6636
Plaintiff:
DARRYL KEITH LOUIS, a/k/a Sadiq
Defendant:
JOEL ANDERSON, Director
Glenn v. Hamm et al
as 5:2026cv00934
Plaintiff:
Luther Glenn
Defendant:
J. Hamm, Mitchell, Shaffer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ANDERSON v. PFIZER INC et al
as 3:2026cv03985
Plaintiff:
DEBRA ANN ANDERSON
Defendant:
PFIZER INC, PHARMACIA & UPJOHN CO LLC and PHARMACIA LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Bybee v. Unum Life Insurance Company of America
as 2:2026cv00034
Plaintiff:
Lisa Bybee and Lisa A. Anderson
Defendant:
Unum Life Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Rodney Powell v. The Estate of Sgt. Davis
as 26-6638
Plaintiff:
RODNEY M. POWELL
Defendant:
THE ESTATE OF SGT. DAVIS, OFFICER LOGAN, WARDEN ANDERSON and others
Smith v. Walton Residential Services et al
as 1:2026cv00105
Defendant:
Thomas B. Hammond, Walton Residential Services, Kisha Carey-Spann and others
Plaintiff:
Willie G. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601 Fair Housing Act
Wilson v. Anderson et al
as 1:2026cv06346
Plaintiff:
James Wilson
Defendant:
Jacari Anderson and Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Anderson v. Kemp et al
as 1:2026cv03032
Plaintiff:
Kyrima Anderson
Defendant:
Brian Kemp, Burt Jones, Christopher Carr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
