Cases 1 - 10 of 676
Wright v. Richardson, et al.
as 2:2024cv11121
Defendant:
Deshon Anderson, Cedric Lamar Richardson, Dawn Palmer and others
Plaintiff:
Bridgett Wright
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
West #367882 v. Unknown Parties et al
as 2:2024cv00057
Plaintiff:
Zorrell West #367882
Defendant:
Unknown Parties, Unknown Anderson, M. Desco and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv10920
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 623 Job Discrimination (Age)
Behovitz et al v. Barry, County of et al
as 1:2024cv00332
Plaintiff:
Brian Behovitz, George Brunette, Michael Burns and others
Defendant:
Barry, County of, Susan VandeCar, Muskegon, County of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Hampton v. Washington et al
as 2:2024cv10769
Plaintiff:
Curtis Lee Hampton and Curtis Lee Hampton, Jr.
Defendant:
Heidi Washington, A. Douglas, Leslie Cummings and others
Anderson et al v. General Motors, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv10680
Plaintiff:
Damian Anderson, Mitch Bartholomew, Guy Beaver and others
Defendant:
General Motors, LLC and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive,
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Heath v. Anderson et al
as 2:2024cv10682
Plaintiff:
Mark A. Heath
Defendant:
Adrian Anderson, Gary Charles Cole, Jr. and Oscoda County of
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv10584
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Heath v. Cole et al
as 1:2024cv10568
Plaintiff:
Mark Andrew Heath and Mark Andrew Heath [E-filer]
Defendant:
Gary Charles Cole, Jr., Adrian Anderson and Oscoda, County of
Stanley v. Kalamazoo, City of et al
as 1:2024cv00145
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Stanley
Defendant:
City of Kalamazoo, Integrated Services of Kalamazoo, Bronson Methodist Hospital and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
