Cases 1 - 10 of 458
Kerri A v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00069
Plaintiff:
Kerri Anderson
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration-Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1063
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Demand Dogs, LLC v. Blair
as 3:2023cv13196
Counter Defendant:
Demand Dogs, LLC
Counter Claimant:
John Blair
Cross Defendant:
Keith Smith and Brian Anderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Parker v. Hutnak, et al
as 23-2006
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID PARKER
Defendant / Appellee:
KIMBERLY HUTNAK, NOELLE K. CLAPHAM, as a representative of the court, and as an individual, PHYLLIS HUTNAK, as an individual and others
In Re: Parker
as 23-2005
Petitioner / Appellant:
DAVID PARKER, acting as guardian on behalf of R.P.
Respondent / Appellee:
KIMBERLY HUTNAK, NOELLE K. CLAPHAM, as a representative of the court, and as an individual, PHYLLIS HUTNAK, as an individual and others
Howard v. Bisenius et al
as 1:2023cv12176
Plaintiff:
David Howard
Defendant:
Theresa A Bisenius, Jennifer M Ulwick, Mary Rudolph Black and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Anderson, et al v. Donovan, et al
as 23-1765
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NATALIE ANDERSON and ANDRE C. BISASOR
Defendant / Appellee:
PATRICK E. DONOVAN, NH SUPREME COURT, NH RULES ADVISORY COMMITTEE and others
Interested Party:
CRAIG S. DONAIS
In Re: Talasazan
as 23-1780
Petitioner:
HAREL TALASAZAN
Respondent:
ROBERT M. FARRELL, MARIA RAIA HAMILTON, MA BOARD OF BAR OVERSEERS and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv30091
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Parker v. Hutnak, et al.
as 1:2023cv00378
Plaintiff:
David Parker
Defendant:
Noelle Clapham, Kimberly Hutnak, Phyllis Hutnak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
