Cases 1 - 10 of 494
Anderson v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00408
Plaintiff:
Kevin R. Anderson
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
C.M. v. DAVIDSON COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION et al
as 1:2024cv00380
Plaintiff:
C.M.
Defendant:
DAVIDSON COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION and ERIC R. ANDERSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Anderson v. Foothills Correctional Institution et al
as 1:2024cv00088
Plaintiff:
Albert Anderson
Defendant:
Foothills Correctional Institution, FNU Hudgins, FNU Motley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States of America v. Palmetto State Armory Rock Pistol et al
as 5:2024cv00088
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Palmetto State Armory Rock Pistol, SCCY CPX-2 Pistol, Two Taurus G3C Pistols and others
Anderson v. McMillian et al
as 5:2024cv00081
Plaintiff:
Albert Anderson
Defendant:
FNU McMillian, Eric Dye, Jeffrey Duncan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. McMillian et al
as 5:2024cv00079
Plaintiff:
Albert Anderson
Defendant:
FNU McMillian, Alexander Correctional Institution, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ANDERSON v. SURRY COUNTY SHERRIFF'S OFFICE, et al
as 1:2024cv00192
Defendant:
JIMMIE CALVIN ANDERSON, SURRY COUNTY SHERRIFF'S OFFICE and BRIAN COCKERHAM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00176
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112 Americans with Disabilities Act
Anderson v. USA
as 3:2024cv00237
Petitioner:
Latisha Anderson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Anderson v. USA
as 3:2024cv00203
Petitioner:
Keishaun Leroy Anderson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
