Cases 1 - 10 of 3,472
Anderson v. USAA Casualty Insurance Company
as 1:2024cv01179
Plaintiff:
Courtney Anderson
Defendant:
USAA Casualty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Kasyjanski v. Allyene et al
as 1:2024cv02278
Plaintiff:
Keith Edward Kasyjanski
Defendant:
Jennifer Allyene, Kelly Lotnard, Nicole Chimenti and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Grant Anderson v. Department of Public Safety & Corrections
as 24-1339
Plaintiff:
GRANT ANDERSON
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY & CORRECTIONS, STATE OF MARYLAND and PRINCE GEORGES COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT, CHIEF OF POLICE
Anderson v. Pollard
as 3:2024cv00290
Plaintiff:
Ryan Keith Anderson
Defendant:
Jason Warren Pollard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Michael Sgro v. FBI
as 24-1325
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL LOUIS SGRO
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, MYRTLE BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT, MYRTLE BEACH CITY ATTORNEY and others
Na'Im Anderson v. Baltimore County, Maryland
as 24-1314
Plaintiff:
NA'IM ANDERSON
Defendant:
BALTIMORE COUNTY, MARYLAND, STATE OF MARYLAND, OFFICE OF THE STATE'S ATTORNEY FOR BALTIMORE COUNTY and others
Albert Anderson v. Reep
as 24-6339
Plaintiff:
ALBERT ANDERSON
Defendant:
REEP, Warden, DOUG NEWTON, Warden, FOOTHILLS CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, Prison and others
Anderson v. West Virginia Division of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 3:2024cv00184
Petitioner:
Ricky Samuel Anderson
Respondent:
West Virginia Division of Corrections and Rehabilitation, WRJ, SRJ and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
David Anderson v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2024cv01764
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company and others
Plaintiff:
David Anderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
