Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2026cv00444
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Robinson v. City of Joliet et al
as 1:2026cv13606
Defendant:
Brielle Robinson, Alessandra Conte, Donna Webdell and others
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Robinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wells, Alfonzo v. Kosterman et al
as 3:2026cv01084
Defendant:
Mitchelle, Mead Medical, Vital Core and others
Plaintiff:
Alfonzo Wells, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miller v. Lovelace et al
as 5:2026cv02183
Defendant:
Jeana Blaclock, Elizabeth Buffler, Charles Hooper and others
Plaintiff:
Mykiea Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alexander et al v. FCA US, LLC
as 1:2026cv01410
Defendant:
FCA US, LLC
Plaintiff:
Maria Deytiquez, Terrance VonBank, Blaine T Mcguire and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2026cv03316
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Nottingham #509284 v. Etlamaki et al
as 2:2026cv00270
Defendant:
Unknown Holt, Unknown Osterman, Unknown Millner, Jr. and others
Plaintiff:
Mitchell Nottingham #509284
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ewell v. NCL (Bahamas), Ltd.
as 1:2026cv27743
Defendant:
NCL (Bahamas), Ltd.
Plaintiff:
Belinda Mitchell Ewell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv01960
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv04211
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
