LASTER v. STATE OF GEORGIA et al
| JUSTIN LASTER |
| GEORGIA STATE BOARD OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES, STATE OF GEORGIA and GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS |
| 1:2020cv00081 |
| May 5, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia |
| LESLIE ABRAMS GARDNER |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 1, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL. (mdm) |
Filing 6
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; granting #5 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; dismissing #1 Complaint. Ordered by US DISTRICT JUDGE LESLIE ABRAMS GARDNER on 07/01/2020. (mdm)
|
| Filing 5 AMENDED MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis Filed by JUSTIN LASTER. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(bcl) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER directing Plaintiff to file an amended motion to proceed IFP by 05/29/2020. Ordered by US DISTRICT JUDGE LESLIE ABRAMS GARDNER on 05/08/2020. (mdm)
|
| Filing 3 Consent Form (28 USC 636(c)(1)) sent to JUSTIN LASTER (bcl) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis Filed by JUSTIN LASTER. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(bcl) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants,filed by JUSTIN LASTER. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Envelope)(bcl) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
