LEWIS v. CLEVELAND et al
| NATERRIOUS CONNARD LEWIS |
| SHERIFF KEVIN SPROUL, DOUGHERTY COUNTY PUBLIC DEFENDERS OFFICE and RIAN CLEVELAND |
| 1:2021cv00110 |
| June 16, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia |
| THOMAS Q LANGSTAFF |
| W LOUIS SANDS |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 13, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE directed to Plaintiff. Ordered by US MAGISTRATE JUDGE THOMAS Q LANGSTAFF on 7/13/2021. (TQL)
|
| Filing 5 MOTION for an emergency writ of habeas corpus to obtain a bond because of bond statute violation. Filed by NATERRIOUS CONNARD LEWIS. (Attachments: #1 Envelope). Motion(s) referred to THOMAS Q LANGSTAFF.(dht) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER for Plaintiff to file a complete motion to proceed IFP, to include a Prisoner Account Statement (Certified Copy). Ordered by US MAGISTRATE JUDGE THOMAS Q LANGSTAFF on 6/23/2021. (TQL)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge issued at the direction of the Court. (dht)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis Filed by NATERRIOUS CONNARD LEWIS. (Attachments: #1 Envelope). Motion(s) referred to THOMAS Q LANGSTAFF.(dht) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by NATERRIOUS CONNARD LEWIS. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(dht) (Main Document 1 replaced on 6/17/2021) (tlf). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
