Cases 1 - 10 of 29
BILOUS v. SPROUL et al
as 1:2024cv00025
Plaintiff:
JUSTAN BILOUS
Defendant:
SHERIFF KEVIN SPROUL, PHOEBE PUTNEY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, PA JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LAWSON JR v. DOUGHERTY COUNTY JAIL et al
as 1:2022cv00210
Plaintiff:
CHARLIE LAWSON JR
Defendant:
DOUGHERTY COUNTY JAIL, PHOEBE HEALTH CARE, LYNN MONTGEARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CROSBY v. SPROUL
as 1:2022cv00131
Petitioner:
JAMES L CROSBY
Respondent:
SHERIFF KEVIN SPROUL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
CROSBY v. SPROUL
as 1:2022cv00124
Petitioner:
JAMES L CROSBY
Respondent:
SHERIFF KEVIN SPROUL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
MONSON v. DOUGHERTY COUNTY JAIL et al
as 1:2022cv00110
Plaintiff:
JERMAINE MONSON
Defendant:
DOUGHERTY COUNTY JAIL, DOUGHERTY COUNTY JUDICIAL SYSTEM, SHERIFF KEVIN SPROUL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CROSBY v. DOUGHERTY COUNTY JAIL et al
as 1:2022cv00107
Plaintiff:
JAMES L CROSBY
Defendant:
DOUGHERTY COUNTY JAIL, DOUGHERTY COUNTY JUDICIAL SYSTEM, SHERIFF KEVIN SPROUL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CARTER v. SPROUL et al
as 1:2022cv00097
Plaintiff:
DESMOND CARTER
Defendant:
SHERIFF KEVIN SPROUL, KEN OSTRANDER, WILLIE LOCKETTE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CLAY v. SPROUL et al
as 1:2022cv00031
Plaintiff:
ALFARUS JAMES CLAY
Defendant:
SHERIFF KEVIN SPROUL, MAJOR BROCK, WEAVER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
THOMAS v. SPROUL
as 1:2021cv00174
Petitioner:
MARQUIS THOMAS
Respondent:
SHERIFF KEVIN SPROUL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
COLEMAN v. SPROUL
as 1:2021cv00167
Petitioner:
KAUURI COLEMAN and KAVURI COLEMAN
Respondent:
SHERIFF KEVIN SPROUL and SHERIFF KEVIN R SPROUL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
