Merial Limited v. Boehringer Ingelheim Vetmedica, Inc.
Plaintiff: Merial Limited
Defendant: Boehringer Ingelheim Vetmedica, Inc.
Case Number: 3:2008cv00116
Filed: December 8, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia
Office: Patent Office
County: Clarke
Presiding Judge: Clay D. Land
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 35:145 Patent Infringement

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 11, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 44 ORDER denying 17 Motion to Dismiss; granting 13 Motion to Transfer Case. Ordered by Judge Clay D. Land on 03/11/2010. (CGC)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Merial Limited v. Boehringer Ingelheim Vetmedica, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Merial Limited
Represented By: Edward Donald Tolley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Boehringer Ingelheim Vetmedica, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?