Cases 1 - 10 of 67
Perrigo Company et al v. Merial Limited et al
as 1:2015cv03674
Plaintiff:
Perrigo Company , Sergeant's Pet Care Products, Inc. , Velcera, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Merial Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
Assistance Dogs of the West v. Merial, Limited
as 1:2015cv00502
Plaintiff:
Assistance Dogs of the West
Defendant:
Merial, Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Merial Limited v. Elanco Animal Health
as 3:2015mc00002
Plaintiff:
MERIAL LIMITED
Defendant:
ELANCO ANIMAL HEALTH
Merial Limited v. Elanco Animal Health
as 4:2015mc00011
Plaintiff:
Merial Limited
Defendant:
Elanco Animal Health
Perrigo Company et al v. Merial Limited et al
as 8:2014cv00403
Plaintiff:
Fidopharm, Inc., Perrigo Company, Sergeant's Pet Care Products, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Merial Limited and Merial SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Biomune Company v. Merial Limited et al
as 2:2014cv02567
Plaintiff:
Biomune Company
Defendant:
Merial Limited and Merial LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Ring, Gina et al v. Merial Limited
as 3:2014cv00600
Plaintiff:
Gina Ring, Debra Ring and Animal Blue Jeans Ring
Defendant:
Merial Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Merial Limited v. MP & Associates, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv02138
Plaintiff:
Merial Limited
Defendant:
MP & Associates, Inc. and Tri-State Animal Clinic, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MERIAL LIMITED v. ELANCO ANIMAL HEALTH
as 3:2014cv00038
Plaintiff:
MERIAL LIMITED
Defendant:
ELANCO ANIMAL HEALTH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Neal Haley, et al v. Merial, Limited, et al
as 13-90030
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
NEAL HALEY, on behalf of himself and others similarly situated, SHERRY HALEY, on behalf of herself and others similarly situated and CLAYTON DAVIS, on behalf of himself and others similarly situated
Defendant - Respondent:
MERIAL, LIMITED, MERIAL, L.L.C. and MERIAL, INCORPORATED
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
