Perrigo Company et al v. Merial Limited et al
| Fidopharm, Inc., Perrigo Company, Sergeant's Pet Care Products, Inc. and Velcera, Inc. |
| Merial Limited and Merial SAS |
| 8:2014cv00403 |
| December 12, 2014 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| 8 Omaha Office |
| John M. Gerrard |
| Cheryl R. Zwart |
| Contract: Recovery/Enforcement |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1330 Breach of Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
125
ORDER that the Plaintiffs' Statement of Objections to the Magistrate Judge's Order Granting Defendants' Motion to Transfer 118 is overruled. The defendants' motion to certify an interlocutory appeal 108 is denied as moot. The Clerk of the Court shall stay transfer of this case for 30 days. The Clerk of the Court is directed to set a case management deadline of August 25, 2015, with the following docket text: check petition for appellate review. Ordered by Judge John M. Gerrard. (JSF)
|
|
Filing
117
ORDER - The plaintiffs' Motion for Stay of Court's June 12, 2015 Order (filing 115 ) is granted in part. Transfer of this case to the Northern District of Georgia will be stayed pending the Court's disposition of objections, if any, to the Magistrate Judge's transfer order. Ordered by Judge John M. Gerrard. (GJG)
|
|
Filing
106
ORDER - Defendant Merial SAS is dismissed as a party. The defendants' alternative motion to transfer this case to the Northern District of Georgia (filing 24 ) is referred to the United States Magistrate Judge for determination pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a). Ordered by Judge John M. Gerrard. (GJG)
|
|
Filing
98
ORDER - 1) As to defendant Merial SAS, Plaintiffs' Motion for Leave to Conduct Expedited Discovery, (Filing No. 14 ), is denied for lack of personal jurisdiction;2) As to defendant Merial LLC, Plaintiffs' Motion for Leave to Conduct Expedited Discovery, (Filing No. 14 ), is denied as moot; and3) The defendants' motion to stay, (Filing No. 27 ), is denied a moot. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (JAB)
|
|
Filing
97
ORDER - On December 12, 2014, the Court entered text notices (filing nos. 7, 8 and 9) which required the parties to file a Corporate Disclosure Statement on Sergeant's Pet Care Products, Inc, Velcera, Inc, and Fidopharm, Inc. on December 29, 201 4. Plaintiff attorneys have not complied, and have not explained the failure to comply, with this order. Plaintiffs are given until May 7, 2015 to show cause why the court should not dismiss for want of prosecution the claims brought by Sergeant's Pet Care Products, Inc, Velcera, Inc, and Fidopharm, Inc. The failure to timely comply with this order may result in dismissal of these Plaintiffs' claims without further notice. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (JAB)
|
|
Filing
86
SCHEDULING ORDER - The defendants may respond to the plaintiffs' motion for restraining order 77 on or before 5 p.m. Central Time, February 24, 2015. The plaintiffs may reply in support of their motion on or before 5 p.m. Central Time, Februar y 25, 2015. At this time, no hearing will be scheduled, unless, and until, the Court is advised that additional evidence will be adduced at an in-court hearing or that oral argument would be beneficial to the Court. Ordered by Judge John M. Gerrard. (CS)
|
|
Filing
22
ORDER granting in part the Plaintiff's 17 Motion to Seal. The Clerk of the Court is directed to restrict access to the plaintiffs' evidence index (filing 20) to court users and case participants. Ordered by Judge John M. Gerrard. (MKR)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
