Johnson v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
| Tyrone D. Johnson and TYRONE JOHNSON |
| COMMISSIONER OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION and COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY |
| SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION (NOTICE) |
| 4:2019cv00002 |
| January 4, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia |
| STEPHEN HYLES |
| CLAY D LAND |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 14, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing Fee (IFP Denied) Paid: Receipt # 113G-3062601, $400 (MARTIN, CHARLES) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to CIVIL PROCESS CLERK, Social Security Administration, U.S. Attorney General. (Attachments: #1 Social Security Administration, #2 U.S. Attorney General)(tlp) |
Filing 3
ORDER denying #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Ordered by US MAGISTRATE JUDGE STEPHEN HYLES on 1-4-19. (jdl)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Tyrone D. Johnson filed by CHARLES LEE MARTIN. (Attachments: #1 Pauper Proposed Order). Motion(s) referred to STEPHEN HYLES.(MARTIN, CHARLES) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT (IFP) against COMMISSIONER OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION filed by Tyrone D. Johnson (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons - Attorney General, #3 Summons - OGC, #4 Summons - Attorney General)(MARTIN, CHARLES) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
