Cases 1 - 10 of 124
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00616
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Johnson v. Lumpkin
as 24-40102
Petitioner:
Mark Tyrone Johnson
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
WOODY et al v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2023cv02315
Plaintiff:
BRANDON WOODY, ANTHONY WHITE, MARCO WEBSTER and others
Defendant:
DENNIS REAGLE, MAGGIE BRYANT, CENTURION HEALTH OF INDIANA, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. SMITH
as 1:2023cv01825
Plaintiff:
TYRON JOHNSON
Defendant:
SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. SMITH
as 1:2023cv01799
Petitioner:
TYRON JOHNSON
Respondent:
SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JOHNSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2023cv01068
Plaintiff:
TYRONE JOHNSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M Occupational Safety LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Lewis et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv03307
Plaintiff:
Billy James Lewis, Patrick Joseph Jessee, Fidel Jimenez, Jr and others
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc, Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Lewis et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv00784
Plaintiff:
Billy James Lewis, Patrick Joseph Jessee, Fidel Jimenez, Jr and others
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc, Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Johnson v. Smith
as 3:2023cv00520
Plaintiff:
Tyron Johnson
Defendant:
Smith
Not Classified By Court:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Curtis Johnson
as 23-11730
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
CURTIS TYRONE JOHNSON
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
