GRAY v. BUSH et al
| NAPOLEON GRAY |
| SONNY PERDUE, SAM NUNN, PRESIDENT GEORGE W BUSH, ROY BARNES, GOVERNOR BRIAN KEMP, FBI DIRECTOR, ZELL MILLER, SAMUEL S OLENS, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, NATHAN DEAL, THURBERT E BAKER, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL and DOES various government officials |
| 4:2020cv00171 |
| July 22, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia |
| STEPHEN HYLES |
| CLAY D LAND |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 11, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Mail Returned - #5 Order on Motion to Amend/Correct, #6 Judgment sent to plaintiff returned as undeliverable (tlf). |
| Filing 6 JUDGMENT dismissing case (tlf). |
Filing 5
ORDER dismissing case. Ordered by US DISTRICT JUDGE CLAY D. LAND on 9/2/2020 (tlf).
|
| Filing 4 MOTION to Amend #1 Complaint filed by NAPOLEON GRAY. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Amended Complaint, #2 Cover Letter, #3 Envelope). Motion referred to US Magistrate Judge STEPHEN HYLES (tlf). |
| Filing 3 Consent Form (28 USC 636(c)(1)) sent to NAPOLEON GRAY (tlf). |
|
Filing 2
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Hyles issued at the direction of the Court (tlf).
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by NAPOLEON GRAY against all defendants (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (tlf). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
