Jones v. Massee et al
| Kevin Jones |
| Bill Massee, Jeff Petty, Montien R Duncan, Chance Allen, Officer Davidson, Richard Chapman and Wesley Nunn |
| 5:2010cv00293 |
| August 9, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia |
| Macon Office |
| Baldwin |
| C. Ashley Royal |
| Claude W. Hicks |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
69
ORDER ADOPTING 68 Report and Recommendations and GRANTING 52 Motion for Summary Judgment. This case is DISMISSED. Ordered by Judge Marc Thomas Treadwell on 9/4/2012. (tlh)
|
|
Filing
58
ORDER regarding 47 MOTION Clarification of Order filed by KEVIN JONES. Ordered by Judge Marc Thomas Treadwell on 10/20/2011. (tlh)
|
|
Filing
45
ORDER ADOPTING 41 Report and Recommendations and GRANTING IN PART and DENYING IN PART 17 Motion to Dismiss Complaint; GRANTING IN PART and DENYING IN PART 27 Motion to Dismiss. Ordered by Judge Marc Thomas Treadwell on 9/29/2011. (tlh)
|
|
Filing
15
ORDER ADOPTING 8 Report and Recommendations. The request for injunctive relief and the claims against Defendants Chatman and Massee are DISMISSED. The claims against Defendants Nunn, Jeff Petty, Montien R. Duncan, Officer Chance Allen, and Officer Davison shall remain pending. Ordered by Judge Marc Thomas Treadwell on 10/20/2010. (tlh)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
