Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Aguilar v. Napa County et al
as 5:2025cv02161
Plaintiff:
Edgar Aguilar
Defendant:
Napa County, Alexander J Alarcon, Paul R. Fernandez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Debenedetto v. Ford et al
as 0:2024cv00636
Plaintiff:
Gary Debenedetto
Defendant:
Mr Ford, RN. Officer Davidson, Associate Warden Mells and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eason v. Raoul et al
as 1:2023cv14204
Plaintiff:
Marilyn Eason
Defendant:
Kwame Raoul, Kim Foxx, Michael Blaha and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shreve v. Stephenson et al
as 5:2022cv00163
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Shreve
Defendant:
B M Stephenson, B. Jones, Officer Howell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Quinn v. Henline et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2020cv00339
Defendant:
Captain Tuck, Officer Templin, Lieutenant Richardson and others
Plaintiff:
Marcus Quinn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kohen Diallo Uhuru v. Jim Bonnifield et al
as 2:2019cv10449
Plaintiff:
Kohen Diallo Uhuru, Diallo Earl Uhuru and Diallo Dynomite
Defendant:
J. Steck, D. Samuel, John Farao and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kevin Andres v. Davidson
as 2:2019cv04754
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Davidson
Plaintiff:
Mr. Kevin Andres
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shreve v. Limpert et al
as 5:2019ct03103
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Shreve and Kimberly Ann Shreve
Respondent:
Officer Limpert, Officer Howell, Officer Lockhart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shreve v. Limpert et al
as 5:2019cv00855
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Shreve and Kimberly Ann Shreve
Defendant:
Officer Limpert, Officer Meyers, Officer Davidson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
CLAYTON v. JOHNSON et al
as 7:2019cv00019
Defendant:
Commissioner HOMER BRYSON, Capt KRAKE, Capt JAVAKA JOHNSON and others
Plaintiff:
EARNEST CLAYTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
