Bishop v. McLaughlin et al
Kyle Richard Bishop, III |
Jamie Hall, Gregory McLaughlin, Clinton Perry, John Hill, Colbert and Johnson |
5:2011cv00107 |
March 18, 2011 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia |
Macon Office |
Macon |
Marc Thomas Treadwell |
Charles H Weigle |
Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 78 ORDER DENYING 77 Motion for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis. Ordered by Judge Marc Thomas Treadwell on 1/18/2013. (tlh) |
Filing 76 ORDER DENYING 75 Motion for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis. Ordered by Judge Marc Thomas Treadwell on 1/3/2013. (tlh) |
Filing 73 ORDER DENYING AS MOOT 72 Motion for Certificate of Appealability. Ordered by Judge Marc Thomas Treadwell on 12/20/2012. (tlh) Modified on 12/21/2012 (cma). |
Filing 69 ORDER adopting in part 65 Report and Recommendations, denying as futile 58 Motion to Amend/Correct and granting 59 Motion to Dismiss Complaint. Accordingly, this case is DISMISSED. Ordered by Judge Marc Thomas Treadwell on 11/30/12 (lap) |
Filing 50 ORDER ADOPTING 39 Report and Recommendations and DENYING 33 Motion for Preliminary Injunction. Ordered by Judge Marc Thomas Treadwell on 6/26/2012. (tlh) |
Filing 32 ORDER ADOPTING IN PART 28 Report and Recommendations; GRANTING IN PART 13 Motion to Dismiss; GRANTING 20 Motion to Dismiss Party; and GRANTING 21 Motion to Amend/Correct. The only remaining claim is the Plaintiff's access to courts clai m against Defendant Jane or John Doe in charge of receiving Federal Express deliveries at Macon State Prison on September 15, 2010. Because no service can be made on Defendant Jane or John Doe in charge of receiving Federal Express deliveries for Ma con State Prison on September 15, 2010, the Court will allow the Plaintiff to perform limited discovery on Defendant Warden Gregory McLaughlin in order to determine the name of this employee. The Plaintiff shall have 60 days from the date of this ord er to ascertain the identity of this employee and to substitute the employee's name as the Defendant. The Order dismissing the Defendants shall be effective upon the expiration of the 60 day discovery period. Should the Plaintiff fail to ascert ain the identities of Defendant Jane or John Doe in charge of receiving Federal Express deliveries at Macon State Prison on September 15, 2010 and amend his Complaint within the 60 day time period, the Defendants, and the entire case, will be dismissed. Ordered by Judge Marc Thomas Treadwell on 3/26/2012. (tlh) |
Filing 22 ORDER ADOPTING 7 Report and Recommendations. Plaintiff's claims against Macon State Prison, the Plaintiff's claims regarding the grievance procedure at Macon State Prison, the Plaintiffs respondeat superior claims against Deputy Warden C linton Perry, and the Plaintiff's request for release from prison are all DISMISSED. The Plaintiff's access-to-courts and free-speech-rights claims against Defendants McLaughlin, Colbert, Johnson and Hall, as well as the Plaintiffs retaliation claim against Defendant Hill, will be allowed to proceed. Therefore, service should be made against the appropriate Defendants. Ordered by Judge Marc Thomas Treadwell on 08/19/2011. (tlh) |
Filing 16 ORDER granting 14 Motion to Stay discovery pending resolution of 13 Motion to Dismiss. Ordered by U.S. Mag Judge Charles H. Weigle on 7/25/11. (mgb) |
Filing 10 ORDER denying 9 Motion Expand the Record as premature. Ordered by U.S. Mag Judge Charles H. Weigle on 5/5/2011. (mgb) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.