Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 111
Samuel Fowler v. Clinton Perry, Jr., et al
as 23-12872
Plaintiff / Appellant: SAMUEL LEWIS FOWLER
Defendant / Appellee: CLINTON PERRY, JR., DEXTER SPIKES, MICHAEL THOMAS and others
DAKER v. WARD et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2022cv00342
Plaintiff: WASEEM DAKER
Defendant: COMMISSIONER TIMOTHY WARD, BRIAN OWENS, HOMER BRYSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Grier v. Perry
as 1:2022cv00388
Petitioner: Demarkus Grier
Respondent: Clinton Perry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SMITH v. PERRY et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2022cv00044
Plaintiff: JR LESTER J SMITH and LESTER J SMITH, JR
Defendant: WARDEN CLINTON PERRY, DEPUTY WARDEN PETER EADY, TAMAJI SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILSON v. PERRY et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2021cv00457
Plaintiff: MICHAEL DAVID WILSON, JR
Defendant: WARDEN CLINTON PERRY, JESSICA DEAN, LACHAKA MCKENZIE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rossell v. Perry
as 3:2021cv00056
Petitioner: Taboris Rossell
Respondent: Warden Clinton Perry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BROWNER v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 5:2021cv00066
Defendant: WARDEN CLINTON PERRY, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, LIEUTENANT FREEMAN and others
Plaintiff: ANTONIO BROWNER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ADAMS v. PERRY et al
as 5:2020cv00435
Defendant: LIEUTENANT HARRIS, JOHN DOE, WARDEN CLINTON PERRY and others
Plaintiff: RONALD DAVID ADAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Grier v. Perry
as 1:2020cv04170
Petitioner: Demarkus Grier
Respondent: Clinton Perry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Dean v. Perry
as 4:2020cv00223
Petitioner: Johnny Keith Dean
Respondent: Clinton Perry and The Attorney General of the State of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?