RAMEY v. BRYSON et al
BENJAMIN SETH RAMEY |
HOMER BRYSON, CALDWELL, TOBY, JOHN DOE, OTIS STANTON and HANCOCK STATE PRISON |
5:2016cv00561 |
December 27, 2016 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia |
Macon Office |
Hancock |
STEPHEN HYLES |
MARC THOMAS TREADWELL |
Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 16 ORDER ADOPTING 6 Report and Recommendations. the Plaintiff;s claim against John Doe Investigator is DISMISSED without prejudice. The Plaintiff's claims against the remaining defendants are allowed to pro ceed for further factual development. It is ORDERED that service be made on Defendants Commissioner Bryson, Warden Caldwell, Warden Toby, Stanton, and Hancock State Prison "Tier Two Classification Committee" and that they file an answer or such other response as may be appropriate under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12, 28 U.S.C. § 1915, and the Prison Litigation Reform Act. The Defendants are also reminded of the duty to avoid unnecessary service expenses and of the possible imposition of ex penses for failure to waive service. The Plaintiff is reminded of his duty to keep the Clerk of Court and all opposing attorneys advised of his current address, duty to prosecute this action, and the provisions regarding discovery in the Magistrate Judges order. Ordered by US DISTRICT JUDGE MARC THOMAS TREADWELL on 6/13/2017. (tlh) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.