Cases 1 - 10 of 303
Kimberly Daniel v. Homer Bryson, et al
as 23-13135
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KIMBERLY DANIEL
Defendant / Appellee:
HOMER BRYSON, RANDY BROWN, STAN SHEPARD and others
Daker v. Dozier et al
as 6:2022cv00072
Plaintiff:
Waseem Daker
Defendant:
Gregory Dozier, Homer Bryson, Timothy Ward and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAKER v. WARD et al
as 5:2022cv00342
Plaintiff:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER TIMOTHY WARD, BRIAN OWENS, HOMER BRYSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAKER v. WARD et al
as 5:2022cv00341
Plaintiff:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER TIMOTHY WARD, GREGORY DOZIER, HOMER BRYSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Waseem Daker v. Timothy Ward, et al
as 22-10632
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant / Appellee:
TIMOTHY WARD, BRIAN OWENS, former Commissioner, HOMER BRYSON, former Commissioner and others
RICHARDSON v. BURNS et al
as 1:2021cv00076
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER HOMER BRYSON, Warden KEVIN SPRAYBERRY, OFFICER Shakera Letrese Burns and others
Plaintiff:
Valencia Richardson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Valencia v. Burns et al
as 1:2021cv00075
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER HOMER BRYSON, Warden KEVIN SPRAYBERRY, OFFICER Shakera Letrese Burns and others
Plaintiff:
Richardson Valencia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Daniel et al v. Bryson et al
as 1:2021cv00039
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Daniel and Stevee Robinson
Defendant:
Randy Brown, Mary Alston, Timothy Young and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daniel et al v. Bryson et al
as 1:2021cv00040
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Daniel and Stevee Robinson
Defendant:
Randy Brown, Mary Alston, Timothy Young and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Salyer v. Upton et al
as 4:2021cv00017
Petitioner:
Monte Salyer
Respondent:
Steve Upton and Homer Bryson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
