HARMON v. OWENS et al
RANDY J HARMON, JR |
BRIAN OWENS, HODGES, HOMER BRYSON, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and COMMISSIONER GREGORY C DOZIER |
5:2018cv00393 |
October 22, 2018 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia |
MARC THOMAS TREADWELL |
CHARLES H WEIGLE |
Prisoner: Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 20, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 AMENDED MOTION Amending #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis Filed by RANDY J HARMON, JR. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(vs) |
Filing 6 AMENDED #1 Complaint/Statement of Claim against All Defendants by RANDY J HARMON, JR (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Envelope)(ans) |
Filing 5 ORDER to submit a proper motion to proceed without the prepayment of the filing fee, which should include a certified copy of his trust fund account statement. Ordered by US MAGISTRATE JUDGE CHARLES H WEIGLE on 12/06/18. (ans) |
Filing 4 Consent Form (28 USC 636(c)(1)) sent to RANDY J HARMON, JR (ans) |
Filing 3 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge issued at the direction of the Court. (ans) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis Filed by RANDY J HARMON, JR.. Motion(s) referred to CHARLES H WEIGLE.(ans) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants,filed by RANDY J HARMON, JR. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Envelope)(ans) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.