SNELLING v. GEORGIA et al
| MICHAEL J SNELLING, JR |
| DOCTOR BRADFORD, COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, COUNTY JAIL, GEORGIA STATE PRISON, JOHNSON STATE PRISON, AUTRY STATE PRISON, UNIT MANAGER ERIC ALLS, CENTRAL STATE PRISON, STATE OF GEORGIA and BALDWIN STATE PRISON |
| 5:2020cv00368 |
| September 16, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia |
| THOMAS Q LANGSTAFF |
| TILMAN E SELF |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 16, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge issued at the direction of the Court. (ggs)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis Filed by MICHAEL J SNELLING, JR. (Attachments: #1 Envelope). Motion(s) referred to THOMAS Q LANGSTAFF.(ggs) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by MICHAEL J SNELLING, JR. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(ggs) |
| REMARK: Plaintiff lists a County Sheriff's Department and a County Jail as defendants. Plaintiff's handwriting is illegible, and the name of the county cannot be determined by the case manager. (ggs) |
| REMARK: Case opened as a new civil action because Plaintiff listed four case numbers on the face of the document: MDGA Case Nos. 1:20-cv-98, 5:20-cv-74, 5:18-cv-438, are all closed cases, and Southern District of GA Case No. 3:19-cv-60.(ggs) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
