SNELLING v. STATE OF GEORGIA et al
MICHAEL J SNELLING, JR |
DR BRADFORD ROBERT, SERGEANT DILLHUNT, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, DEPUTY OFFICER ROBERT STROY, JOHNSON STATE PRISON, AUTRY STATE PRISON, UNIT MANAGER ERIC ALLS, CENTRAL STATE PRISON, STATE OF GEORGIA, BALDWIN STATE PRISON and FULTON COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT |
5:2020cv00433 |
November 12, 2020 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia |
TILMAN E SELF |
CHARLES H WEIGLE |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 3, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis Filed by MICHAEL J SNELLING, JR. (Attachments: #1 Envelope). Motion(s) referred to CHARLES H WEIGLE.(tam) |
Filing 3 ORDER Plaintiff has TWENTY-ONE (21) days from the date on this Order to either pay the $400.00 filing fee or petition the Court to proceed in forma pauperis. Failure to do so, will result in dismissal of this action. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to forward the standard in forma pauperis application and associated documents with this civil action number on them along with a copy of this Order. Ordered by US MAGISTRATE JUDGE CHARLES H WEIGLE on 11/20/2020. (tam) |
Filing 2 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge issued at the direction of the Court. (tam) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by MICHAEL J SNELLING, JR. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(tam) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.