SPIVEY v. UNKNOWN WARDEN et al
| MANDRIEZ SPIVEY |
| UNKNOWN WARDEN, UNKNOWN ASSISTANT WARDEN, UNKNOWN MANAGER, UNKNOWN COUNSELOR and UNKNOWN INTAKE STAFF |
| 5:2022cv00166 |
| May 2, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia |
| TILMAN E SELF |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 17, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Acknowledgment of Electronic Case Transfer Out by District of EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA; Case Number 5:22-ct-03168. (tam) |
| Case Electronically Transferred Out - District Transfer to Eastern District of North Carolina. All documents, including a certified copy of the docket sheet and pleading were transferred electronically. **The Notice of Electronic Filing serves as certification for these transferred documents.**(Case Transfer Acknowledgment deadline 5/31/2022.) (mdm) |
Filing 4
ORDER OF TRANSFER transferring proceedings to the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina. Ordered by US DISTRICT JUDGE TILMAN E. SELF, III on 5/16/2022.(ech)
|
| Filing 3 MOTION to Appoint Counsel Filed by MANDRIEZ SPIVEY. (tam) Modified on 5/3/2022 (tam). |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis Filed by MANDRIEZ SPIVEY. (tam) Modified on 5/3/2022 (tam). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by MANDRIEZ SPIVEY. (tam) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
