Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Spivey v. Unknown Warden et al
as 5:2022ct03168
Plaintiff:
Mandriez Spivey
Defendant:
Unknown Warden, Unknown Assistant Warden, Unknown Manager and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
SPIVEY v. UNKNOWN WARDEN et al
as 5:2022cv00166
Plaintiff:
MANDRIEZ SPIVEY
Defendant:
UNKNOWN WARDEN, UNKNOWN ASSISTANT WARDEN, UNKNOWN MANAGER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
SPIVEY v. EBBERT et al
as 1:2022cv00596
Plaintiff:
MANDRIEZ SPIVEY
Defendant:
Ebbert, UNKNOWN SW, Marr and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
SPIVEY v. HANCOCK et al
as 1:2022cv00041
Plaintiff:
MANDRIEZ SPIVEY
Defendant:
SHERIFF BILLY HANCOCK, CPT JOE ARZOLA, SGT JACK MASTERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SPIVEY v. EBBERT et al
as 5:2022cv00150
Plaintiff:
MANDRIEZ SPIVEY
Defendant:
WARDEN EBBERT, UNKNOWN SW, COUNSELOR MARR and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
SPIVEY v. WOODFORD et al
as 5:2022cv00066
Plaintiff:
MANDRIEZ SPIVEY
Defendant:
ERICA WOODFORD, DENISE MCGHEE, ANITA RENOLDS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Spivey v. FDC Miami et al
as 1:2022cv20300
Plaintiff:
Mandriez Spivey
Defendant:
FDC Miami, Unknown Miami Warden, Unknown FDC Miami Dentist and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
SPIVEY v. HANCOCK et al
as 1:2022cv00010
Plaintiff:
MANDRIEZ SPIVEY
Defendant:
SHERIFF BILLY HANCOCK, CPT JOE ARZOLA, SGT JACK MASTERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
SPIVEY v. HUMPHREY et al
as 5:2021cv00467
Plaintiff:
MANDRIEZ SPIVEY
Defendant:
WARDEN HUMPHREY, MALONE, DR JOHN ROWLES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SPIVEY v. WARDEN et al
as 5:2021cv00398
Plaintiff:
MANDRIEZ SPIVEY
Defendant:
UNKNOWN WARDEN, ASSISTANT WARDEN A W UNKNOWN, PSYCHOLOGICAL TEAM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
