RIDLEY v. WARD et al
EDWARD TYRONE RIDLEY |
COMMISSIONER TIMOTHY WARD, WARDEN LAWRENCE WHITTINGTON, WARDEN WILKES, WARDEN KARL FORTE, CAPTAIN KING, WARDEN FORD, JOHN DOE, DEPUTY WAREN COWEN WARD, HELEN DOGAN, DEPUTY WARDEN RICKY ALEXANDER, CAPTAIN LATOYA RIGGINS, SGT BINES, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER JOHN DOE and UNIT MANAGER JAMES |
5:2022cv00205 |
June 6, 2022 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia |
THOMAS Q LANGSTAFF |
MARC T TREADWELL |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 ORDER denying #4 Plaintiff's MOTION to Appoint Counsel ; REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis and #1 Complaint filed by Plaintiff. Ordered by US MAGISTRATE JUDGE THOMAS Q LANGSTAFF on 7/14/2022. (TQL) |
Filing 4 MOTION to Appoint Counsel Filed by EDWARD TYRONE RIDLEY. (Attachments: #1 Envelope). Motion(s) referred to THOMAS Q LANGSTAFF. ***Second page is illegible, scanned in as received***(tam) |
Filing 3 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge issued at the direction of the Court. (tam) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis Filed by EDWARD TYRONE RIDLEY. (Attachments: #1 Envelope). Motion(s) referred to THOMAS Q LANGSTAFF.(tam) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by EDWARD TYRONE RIDLEY. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(tam) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.