Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Walls v. Mershon et al
as 3:2024cv50011
Plaintiff:
Nirin Walls
Defendant:
N.P. Mershon, Nurse Hayes, Ms. Carpenter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
White v. Wilkes
as 4:2023cv00019
Petitioner:
Willard Frank White
Respondent:
Warden Wilkes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hodge v. Wilkes
as 1:2022cv03909
Petitioner:
Willie C. Hodge
Respondent:
Warden Wilkes and The Attorney General of the State of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ridley v. Wilks
as 1:2022cv02982
Petitioner:
Edward Tyrone Ridley
Respondent:
WARDEN WILKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
RIDLEY v. WARD et al
as 5:2022cv00246
Plaintiff:
EDWARD TYRONE RIDLEY
Defendant:
TIMOTHY WARD, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, EPA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIAMS v. KILBY et al
as 1:2022cv00099
Plaintiff:
TAYMAR FREDERICK WILLIAMS
Defendant:
WARDEN RICHARD KILBY, WARDEN OF SECURITY MCCLUNG, COMMISSIONER TIMOTHY WARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lisle, Jr. v. Ditzler et al
as 1:2022cv03343
Plaintiff:
Steven D. Lisle, Jr.
Defendant:
D. Ditzler, Service List, Luitenant McBride and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RIDLEY v. JACKSON et al
as 5:2022cv00229
Plaintiff:
EDWARD TYRONE RIDLEY
Defendant:
TARRA JACKSON, WARDEN WILKES and TIMOTHY WARD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RIDLEY v. WARD et al
as 5:2022cv00205
Plaintiff:
EDWARD TYRONE RIDLEY
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER TIMOTHY WARD, WARDEN LAWRENCE WHITTINGTON, WARDEN WILKES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RIDLEY v. WILKS
as 1:2022cv00063
Petitioner:
EDWARD TYRONE RIDLEY
Respondent:
WARDEN WILKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
