SANDERS v. FORD et al
Plaintiff: JOHN NICHOLAS SANDERS
Defendant: BENJAMIN FORD, WARDEN AIMEE SMITH, LIEUTENANT FUDGE, WARDEN JACOB BEASLEY, UNIT MANAGER TANGIE MORRISON and FLUCAS
Case Number: 5:2022cv00295
Filed: August 10, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia
Presiding Judge: MARC T TREADWELL
Referring Judge: CHARLES H WEIGLE
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 20, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 5, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 USM 285 Process Receipt and Return ISSUED for JACOB BEASLEY, FLUCAS, BENJAMIN FORD, TANGIE MORRISON, AIMEE SMITH (Attachments: #1 USM 285 FLUCAS, #2 USM 285 BENJAMIN FORD, #3 USM 285 TANGIE MORRISON, #4 USM 285 AIMEE SMITH)(ggs)
October 5, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; granting #4 Motion to Amend/Correct; granting #5 Motion to Amend/Correct. At this stage of the proceeding, Plaintiff is permitted to amend his complaint once as a matter of right. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(1). In this case, Plaintiffs motions to amend are now GRANTED, and his additional claims are considered herein. REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #1 Complaint, #4 MOTION to Amend/Correct #1 Complaint, filed by JOHN NICHOLAS SANDERS, #5 MOTION to Amend/Correct #1 Complaint, filed by JOHN NICHOLAS SANDERS; Plaintiff will be allowed to proceed for further factual development on his claim that Benjamin Ford, Warden Aimee Smith, Warden Jacob Beasley, Tangie Morrison, and Mr. Flucas denied him due process with regard to his placement on Tier II. It is RECOMMENDED that all of Plaintiffs remaining claims be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to state a claim. ORDER Directing Service on DEFENDANTS BENJAMIN FORD, WARDEN AIMEE SMITH, WARDEN JACOB BEASLEY, UNIT MANAGER TANGIE MORRISON, and DISCIPLINARY REPORT INVESTIGATOR MR. FLUCAS. Ordered by US MAGISTRATE JUDGE CHARLES H WEIGLE on 10/5/2022. (ggs)
September 12, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 SECOND MOTION to Amend to Add Additional Defendants and Claims #1 Complaint, Filed by JOHN NICHOLAS SANDERS. (Attachments: #1 Attachment 3 - Revision to Dispiclinary SOP, #2 Attachment 4 - Warden's Grievance Response, #3 Attachment 5 - Trust Account Statement, #4 Attachment 6 - Receipt dated 6/27/2022, #5 Envelope). Motion(s) referred to CHARLES H WEIGLE.(ggs)
September 2, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 MOTION to Amend to Add Additional Claims and a Additional Defendant re #1 Complaint. Filed by JOHN NICHOLAS SANDERS. (Attachments: #1 Envelope). Motion(s) referred to CHARLES H WEIGLE.(ggs)
August 10, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge issued at the direction of the Court. (tam)
August 10, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis Filed by JOHN NICHOLAS SANDERS. (Attachments: #1 Trust Account Statement, #2 Envelope). Motion(s) referred to CHARLES H WEIGLE.(tam)
August 10, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by JOHN NICHOLAS SANDERS. (Attachments: #1 Additional Claims, #2 Attachment A-List of Missing Property, #3 Attachment B- Offender Personal Property Inventory, #4 Attachment 1- Tier 2 Property Allowance, #5 Attachment 2- Tier II Conditions and Privileges, #6 Envelope)(tam)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: SANDERS v. FORD et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: JOHN NICHOLAS SANDERS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: BENJAMIN FORD
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: WARDEN AIMEE SMITH
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: LIEUTENANT FUDGE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: WARDEN JACOB BEASLEY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: UNIT MANAGER TANGIE MORRISON
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: FLUCAS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?